What Business Model Makes a Cold Spray Coating Service Financeable?
A cold spray coating service is not a conventional paint shop. It is a capital-intensive industrial process business that sells engineering, qualification, metal deposition, repair, machining, inspection, and documentation as one controlled outcome. The cold spray process accelerates metal powder through a supersonic nozzle and bonds particles in the solid state rather than melting them. That technical distinction matters financially because it opens work on heat-sensitive alloys, dimensional restoration, corrosion protection, electrical conductivity, and structural repair, but it also raises the bar for process development and quality evidence. The TWI cold spraying overview describes the process and the range of metals that can be deposited.
The most bankable model usually combines three revenue streams. First, feasibility and coupon work pays for engineering time before production is promised. Second, qualified production or repair work generates machine-hour, material, and inspection revenue. Third, field mobilization or recurring maintenance agreements create higher-value, less price-sensitive revenue when customer downtime is expensive. A shop that quotes only “price per square foot” will usually underprice the real work because geometry, masking, powder behavior, deposition efficiency, machining allowance, and acceptance testing dominate cost.
Feasibility coupons
Dimensional restoration
Corrosion barriers
Aerospace and defense MRO
Energy equipment repair
Conductive coatings
3 revenue layers
Engineering plus production plus documentation is more resilient than selling spray time alone. The first layer funds process development, the second absorbs cell overhead, and the third protects margin when customers require traceability, destructive testing, or on-site execution.
Customer mix also changes the economics. Aerospace, defense, nuclear, and regulated energy customers can support larger qualification budgets and repeat programs, but sales cycles may run six to eighteen months. General industrial repair can close faster, but jobs are less standardized and often arrive as urgent one-offs. A practical launch plan therefore needs a pipeline of shorter-cycle repair work while two or three anchor qualification programs mature.
The financeable positioning
Sell avoided replacement cost, avoided downtime, and verified restoration performance. Do not compete as a commodity coating vendor when the process cell, gas system, powder inventory, and engineering staff are built for high-consequence repairs.
How Much Startup Investment Does a Cold Spray Cell Require?
For a U.S. service business built around one high-pressure cold spray cell, a realistic planning range is approximately $1.0M-$2.8M. This is an assumption range for early financial modeling, not a vendor quote. The gap is wide because a manual, limited-material system is very different from a robot-integrated cell with gas boosting, powder handling, dust collection, machining, metrology, and customer-specific qualification. Industrial equipment can operate at high pressure and high temperature: for example, the Impact Innovations system specifications describe process pressures up to 60 bar at the gun, which implies substantial gas-management and facility infrastructure.
| Startup category |
Planning range |
What the allowance must cover |
| Cold spray process system |
$250,000-$700,000 |
Gun, heater, feeder, controls, nozzles, cooling, data capture, commissioning. |
| Robot, positioner, guarding, integration |
$120,000-$350,000 |
Six-axis robot, turntable or positioner, offline programming, safety interlocks. |
| Gas supply and high-pressure infrastructure |
$75,000-$250,000 |
Compressor or booster, storage, manifold, piping, regulators, monitoring. |
| Booth, ventilation, dust collection |
$60,000-$180,000 |
Enclosure, extraction, filtration, housekeeping controls, discharge design. |
| Electrical and facility improvements |
$40,000-$150,000 |
Three-phase service, cooling water, HVAC, slab and utility modifications. |
| Surface prep, machining, and metrology |
$100,000-$300,000 |
Blast cabinet, lathe or mill access, dimensional inspection, coating thickness tools. |
| Qualification and laboratory testing |
$35,000-$120,000 |
Coupons, microscopy, adhesion, porosity, hardness, chemistry, outside labs. |
| Initial powders and consumables |
$25,000-$90,000 |
Core aluminum, copper, nickel, steel or specialty alloy powders, abrasives, masks. |
| Training, software, insurance, legal |
$30,000-$85,000 |
Operator training, quality documents, contracts, initial premiums, software licenses. |
| Working capital reserve |
$250,000-$600,000 |
Four to six months of payroll, gas, powder, rent, testing, travel, and debt service. |
| Total estimated project investment |
$985,000-$2,825,000 |
Round the model to $1.0M-$2.8M until written quotes replace assumptions. |
The most common budgeting error is buying the spray system first and treating everything around it as optional. A service company gets paid for accepted parts, not for owning a gun. If the quote excludes dust collection, gas delivery, part handling, machining, inspection, spares, and process qualification, the “equipment price” can understate the cash need by half.
$350K-$900KLean entry pathLow-pressure or portable niche work, limited materials, outsourced machining and testing, owner-led sales.
$1.0M-$2.8MFull service cellHigh-pressure system, robot, gas infrastructure, controlled booth, in-house inspection, launch reserve.
10%-15%Contingency allowanceHold outside the quoted budget for integration changes, utilities, freight, customs, and qualification rework.
What Will Monthly Operating Expenses Look Like?
A one-cell operation can burn $99,000-$306,000 per month before owner distributions, depending on staffing, powder mix, gas choice, facility cost, outside testing, and debt. Some lines are fixed, while powder, process gas, machining, freight, and project-specific testing move with workload. The distinction matters: break-even is driven by fixed cash cost, but job margin is driven by variable consumption and yield.
Labor deserves a conservative budget. The business needs more than a spray operator: process engineering, robot programming, quality, machining, material handling, quoting, and customer communication all consume hours. As an adjacent labor benchmark, the Bureau of Labor Statistics national wage table reported a May 2025 mean wage of $25.30 per hour for coating, painting, and spraying machine setters, operators, and tenders. Cold spray technicians and process engineers generally require a premium over broad production-operator averages, plus payroll taxes, benefits, overtime, and training time.
| Monthly expense |
Planning range |
Cost behavior |
Control metric |
| Payroll and burden |
$35,000-$85,000 |
Mostly fixed, with overtime risk |
Revenue per direct labor hour |
| Facility rent and occupancy |
$8,000-$20,000 |
Fixed |
Occupancy cost as a percent of revenue |
| Process gas and electricity |
$8,000-$30,000 |
Variable by recipe and utilization |
Gas cost per spray hour |
| Powders, abrasives, masks, consumables |
$12,000-$55,000 |
Variable |
Powder cost per deposited pound |
| Maintenance, nozzles, and spares |
$4,000-$15,000 |
Semi-variable |
Maintenance cost per cell hour |
| QA, lab testing, and machining |
$5,000-$18,000 |
Project driven |
Outside services as a percent of job revenue |
| Insurance, compliance, professional fees |
$4,000-$10,000 |
Mostly fixed |
Annual premium per $1M revenue |
| Sales, travel, freight, and demonstrations |
$5,000-$20,000 |
Ramp and pipeline driven |
Qualified pipeline per sales dollar |
| Debt service |
$15,000-$45,000 |
Fixed by financing structure |
Debt-service coverage ratio |
| Administration and software |
$3,000-$8,000 |
Mostly fixed |
Admin cost as a percent of revenue |
| Total monthly cash requirement |
$99,000-$306,000 |
Mix of fixed and variable |
Use a 13-week cash forecast |
Illustrative base-case monthly cash mix
Payroll and debt create the fixed-cost floor; powder and gas determine whether higher utilization converts into profit.
Payroll and burden34%
Powder and consumables21%
Debt service15%
Gas and electricity12%
Facility and insurance10%
Sales, QA, admin, other8%
How Should Cold Spray Jobs Be Priced?
Price the uncertainty before pricing the coating. A new alloy-substrate pair can require powder screening, parameter development, coupon deposition, sectioning, microscopy, adhesion tests, dimensional checks, and customer review. Those activities should be a paid phase with a defined deliverable. Once the process window is accepted, the production quote can use repeatable machine-hour, powder, setup, machining, and inspection assumptions.
The service can support premium pricing because deposition rates and achievable materials vary widely. Industrial cold spray additive equipment can report deposition rates up to 100 grams per minute for selected materials, while lower rates apply to other alloys and geometries; the WarpSPEE3D specifications provide one useful reference point. A quote should therefore use the validated deposition rate for the actual powder and geometry, not a brochure maximum.
| Revenue unit |
Illustrative U.S. planning range |
What to include |
Main pricing risk |
| Feasibility study |
$5,000-$25,000 |
Review, powder selection, trial plan, initial coupon. |
Too many unpriced iterations. |
| Qualification package |
$10,000-$60,000 |
Coupons, destructive tests, report, parameter record. |
Customer adds tests after award. |
| Production setup or NRE |
$15,000-$75,000 |
Robot path, tooling, masking, fixtures, first-article inspection. |
Setup buried in unit price and never recovered. |
| Billable cell hour |
$600-$1,500 per hour |
Equipment, operator, standard gas, routine inspection. |
Rate excludes idle setup and changeover time. |
| Powder charge |
Cost plus 20%-50% |
Purchased powder, handling, screening, traceability, expected loss. |
Deposition efficiency below quote assumption. |
| Field service day |
$8,000-$25,000 plus mobilization |
Crew, portable system, travel, site setup, standby terms. |
Access delays and customer-controlled downtime. |
| Turnkey repair project |
$25,000-$250,000+ |
Engineering, deposition, machining, inspection, documentation. |
Scope creep or failed acceptance testing. |
For repeat programs, separate one-time nonrecurring engineering from unit production pricing. Then add annual price adjustments for powder, nitrogen or helium, labor, and outside testing. That structure makes customer negotiations clearer and prevents a long-term blanket order from locking the shop into a margin that only worked during the first year.
Where Is Break-Even, and What Moves It?
Break-even is not a single sales number until the business defines contribution margin. For this service, variable costs include powder, process gas, project machining, outside tests, freight, and sometimes direct overtime. Fixed costs include salaried labor, core hourly staffing, facility, insurance, software, maintenance retainers, administration, and most debt service.
| Monthly scenario |
Billable cell hours |
Total revenue |
Contribution margin |
Fixed cash cost |
Operating cash result |
| Conservative ramp |
160 |
$174,000 |
55% or $96,000 |
$130,000 |
-$34,000 |
| Base utilization |
240 |
$314,000 |
62% or $195,000 |
$140,000 |
$55,000 |
| Strong repeat-program mix |
320 |
$480,000 |
66% or $317,000 |
$155,000 |
$162,000 |
This scenario assumes two-shift capacity is available as demand grows. A one-shift cell may offer only 150 to 190 practical production hours after preventive maintenance, changeovers, powder loading, masking, calibration, inspection, and unplanned downtime. Capacity planning should use productive hours, not calendar hours.
Profit sensitivity at the base case
The fastest route to profit is usually better realized rate and deposition efficiency, not simply more quoted work.
Realized hourly rateHigh impact
Deposition efficiencyHigh impact
Billable utilizationHigh impact
Rework rateMedium
Facility costLower
Gas, Powder, Labor, and Deposition Efficiency Control Margin
Cold spray margin is a yield problem disguised as a coating problem. Powder is purchased by weight, but customers pay for accepted deposited material, restored dimensions, or a qualified part. The financial model must convert powder feed rate into deposited mass, then add overspray, retained inventory, screening loss, setup scrap, and rejected parts. Research has demonstrated deposition efficiencies up to 95% in specific copper-on-aluminum conditions, as reported in the University of North Texas research record, but that result should not be generalized across alloys, geometries, or production recipes.
50%-85%Modeled deposition efficiencyUse a material- and geometry-specific range until production data is stable.
5%-12%Rework reserveReasonable during early qualification; reduce below 5% for repeat work.
10%-20%Setup and changeover timeAs a share of scheduled cell time in a mixed-job service shop.
2-6 weeksSpecialty powder lead timePlanning assumption; verify alloy, lot size, atomization route, and certificate needs.
Gas selection creates another trade-off. Nitrogen is generally the economic default for many high-pressure applications; helium can improve particle velocity for difficult materials but can overwhelm job economics unless separately quoted. Compressed air may fit certain systems and alloys. Each production traveler should record gas type, pressure, temperature, flow, powder feed, standoff distance, traverse speed, and actual deposition. That data is both a quality record and a cost ledger.
Margin pressure test
In the base monthly scenario, a five-point drop in contribution margin on $314,000 of revenue removes about $15,700 of monthly operating cash. One poorly quoted specialty-alloy program can erase the profit from several routine aluminum repairs.
How Much Working Capital Is Needed During Qualification and Ramp-Up?
Plan for four to six months of cash operating needs after equipment installation, and more when the sales strategy depends on aerospace, defense, or utility qualifications. A shop can be technically ready but commercially idle while customers review coupons, approve procedures, negotiate terms, and schedule first articles. Meanwhile, payroll, rent, insurance, software, maintenance, and debt service continue.
Cold spray can reduce customer downtime in repair settings. The U.S. Department of Energy has highlighted cold-spray development for hydropower component repair in constrained locations, including work intended to reduce cavitation-related damage and repair time; see the DOE hydropower repair article. That value proposition can support strong project prices, but large industrial customers often pay on net-30 to net-60 terms after acceptance. The service provider funds powder, labor, travel, and testing before cash arrives.
0-3Facility and installationPay deposits, utilities, integration, freight, training, and initial insurance.
3-6Process developmentRun coupons, build parameter windows, calibrate costing, and create quality documents.
6-12Customer qualificationFund samples, tests, first articles, site visits, and delayed receivables.
12-24Repeat productionAdd shifts only after backlog supports labor and working-capital needs.
Cash-flow mistake to avoid
Do not count a purchase order as cash. A $150,000 project may require $45,000 of powder, outside machining, travel, and overtime before invoicing. If acceptance takes three weeks and payment takes another forty-five days, the project can consume cash for two to three months even when its accounting margin is attractive.
A financially framed opening sequence
-
Validate paid demand. Secure letters of intent, sample commitments, or funded feasibility work before final equipment selection.
-
Freeze the service scope. Decide which alloys, part sizes, industries, and field capabilities the first cell will support.
-
Quote the complete cell. Include gas, ventilation, integration, metrology, machining access, training, spares, and qualification.
-
Map permits and hazards. Complete dust, ventilation, noise, fire, waste, and compressed-gas reviews before signing a lease.
-
Build the costing database. Track powder feed, deposition, gas, setup, spray time, machining, inspection, and rework by job.
-
Launch with milestone billing. Bill deposits, qualification completion, first article, and final acceptance rather than financing the full project.
Which KPIs Show Whether the Cell Is Actually Productive?
Revenue can rise while cash and margin deteriorate, so the dashboard must link commercial activity to cell productivity and material yield. The best indicators are calculated from job travelers, powder issue records, time logs, quality results, invoices, and receivables. Targets below are planning ranges for a specialized one-cell service company. Replace them with material- and customer-specific history as soon as twelve months of data exists.
| KPI |
Formula |
Planning benchmark or warning rule |
Decision it drives |
| Billable cell utilization |
Billable production hours ÷ available scheduled cell hours |
Target 55%-70%; warning below 45% after ramp |
Hiring, shift count, sales urgency, maintenance timing |
| Realized cell rate |
Cell-related revenue ÷ billable cell hours |
Model $950-$1,300; investigate discounting below plan |
Quote discipline and customer mix |
| Deposition efficiency |
Deposited powder mass ÷ powder fed |
Set by material; 60%-85% may be a useful planning band |
Powder cost, gas use, cycle time, parameter development |
| Contribution margin |
Revenue minus variable job costs ÷ revenue |
Target 50%-65%; warning below modeled break-even margin |
Pricing, material surcharge, make-or-buy decisions |
| First-pass acceptance |
Accepted parts without rework ÷ completed parts |
Target above 95% for repeat programs |
Process stability, training, fixture and inspection changes |
| Engineering-to-production conversion |
Qualified programs entering production ÷ completed feasibility programs |
Target 30%-50%; lower may signal poor lead qualification |
Sales focus and R&D spending |
| Backlog coverage |
Confirmed backlog revenue ÷ average weekly revenue capacity |
Target 8-12 weeks without chronic lateness |
Shift planning, material purchases, capacity investment |
| Days sales outstanding |
Accounts receivable ÷ annual credit sales × 365 |
Target below 45 days; warning above 60 |
Deposits, milestone billing, collection action |
| Debt-service coverage ratio |
Cash available for debt service ÷ principal and interest |
Model at 1.25× or higher; stress test at 1.10× |
Borrowing capacity, owner draws, reserve policy |
Quality evidence is part of productivity, not an administrative afterthought. NIST has supported work on sensors and process control for cold spray additive manufacturing, reflecting the importance of feedstock and parameter monitoring; the NIST project announcement explains that focus. Better data shortens root-cause analysis, protects repeatability, and reduces the hidden labor cost of troubleshooting.
Weekly operating review
- Compare quoted versus actual setup, spray, machining, and inspection hours.
- Reconcile powder issued, powder returned, deposited mass, and waste.
- Review rejected coupons, rework hours, and customer acceptance delays.
- Update the thirteen-week cash forecast with purchase orders and receivable dates.
- Separate booked backlog from technically unqualified pipeline.
Compliance, Quality, and Customer Qualification Are Financial Risks
The process is solid-state, but it is not low-risk. Fine aluminum, magnesium, titanium, and other metal powders can present combustible-dust hazards. High-pressure gas, heated equipment, noise, robotic motion, airborne particulate, abrasive surface preparation, and waste streams require formal controls. OSHA notes that even aluminum or iron can be explosible in finely divided dust form; its combustible dust guidance should be part of the facility review.
Ventilation design must be assessed for the actual powder, process, booth, and surface-preparation operations. OSHA's 29 CFR 1910.94 ventilation standard addresses abrasive blasting and spray-finishing controls. State fire codes, air permits, building permits, compressed-gas rules, and local wastewater or stormwater requirements can add engineering and schedule cost. The exact permit set is location-specific, so a lease should be contingent on a written code and environmental review.
| Risk |
Financial exposure |
Early warning |
Planning response |
| Combustible metal powder event |
Injury, shutdown, property loss, uninsured exclusions |
Dust accumulation, unsuitable vacuums, poor segregation |
Hazard analysis, engineered collection, housekeeping, insurer review |
| Failed qualification |
$10,000-$100,000+ of unrecovered labor and testing |
Unstable porosity, adhesion, hardness, dimensions |
Paid stage gates and customer-approved test plan |
| Powder lot variability |
Lower deposition, requalification, schedule delay |
Particle-size or morphology shifts, certificate changes |
Approved suppliers, incoming checks, safety stock |
| Gas price or availability shock |
Contribution-margin compression and missed delivery |
Helium-heavy recipes, single supplier, cylinder logistics |
Surcharges, nitrogen alternatives, storage and supply contracts |
| Nozzle or heater failure |
Lost billable hours and expedited parts |
Rising maintenance cost, unstable parameters |
Critical spares, preventive maintenance, service agreement |
| Customer concentration |
Revenue cliff when one program pauses |
Top customer exceeds 35% of revenue |
Diversify end markets and maintain paid development pipeline |
Quality requirements can be expensive but commercially valuable. ASTM C633 covers tensile adhesion or cohesion testing for thermal spray coatings; the current ASTM C633-24 page explains the test scope. Customers may also require metallography, porosity, hardness, chemistry, dimensional inspection, process-parameter records, powder traceability, and first-article documentation. Quote these deliverables explicitly.
Waste classification also affects cost. Overspray, spent abrasive, filters, and contaminated powders may require characterization based on material and substrate. The EPA's hazardous-waste guide for small businesses is a useful starting point, but state rules and actual waste testing control the final handling plan.
How Should the Business Be Funded?
Match financing duration to asset life. Long-lived equipment, facility improvements, and owned real estate should not be funded entirely with short-term working-capital debt. Conversely, qualification labor, powder inventory, receivables, and launch losses need flexible cash rather than a loan that only reimburses fixed assets.
25%-40%Owner or investor equityAbsorbs integration surprises, qualification delays, and lender-required injection. More equity lowers debt service but dilutes returns.
40%-60%Term equipment financingFits the spray cell, robot, gas system, and durable inspection assets. Require vendor quotes and collateral schedules.
15%-30%Working-capital facilitySupports powder, payroll, testing, milestone gaps, and receivables. Borrowing base and covenants must fit long customer cycles.
The SBA 7(a) program can support eligible business acquisitions, equipment, and working capital, with a maximum loan amount of $5 million. The SBA 504 program can be relevant for major fixed assets and owner-occupied real estate, subject to lender and program requirements. Equipment leases, vendor finance, state manufacturing incentives, strategic-customer deposits, and research contracts can complement those sources.
Lender and investor readiness
- Show written quotes for the complete process cell and facility work.
- Separate signed backlog, paid qualifications, letters of intent, and speculative pipeline.
- Provide a monthly twenty-four-month model with utilization, pricing, powder yield, and DSO assumptions.
- Stress test a 25% sales shortfall, a five-point margin decline, and a six-month qualification delay.
- Document management experience in materials, industrial sales, quality, and equipment maintenance.
- Maintain a minimum cash reserve and a debt-service coverage covenant before owner distributions.
Tax treatment can influence timing but should not justify an otherwise weak investment. For tax years beginning in 2026, IRS Publication 946 states a Section 179 maximum deduction of $2.56 million, subject to eligibility, taxable-income limits, and phaseout rules; review the current IRS depreciation guidance with a tax adviser before modeling the benefit.
What Can the Owner Earn, and How Long Is Payback?
Owner income is not revenue, gross margin, or EBITDA. The business must first pay variable job costs, staff, rent, utilities, insurance, maintenance, sales expense, professional fees, taxes, debt service, replacement capex, and working-capital reserves. An owner who also serves as general manager or technical director should separate a market-based salary from profit distributions; otherwise the model overstates the return on invested capital.
| Annual scenario |
Revenue |
Contribution margin |
Cash operating costs |
Debt, tax, capex, reserves |
Potential owner cash after salary |
Payback on $1.8M investment |
| Conservative |
$2.4M |
45% or $1.08M |
$900,000 |
$180,000 |
$0 |
No economic payback yet |
| Base |
$3.8M |
55% or $2.09M |
$1.35M |
$440,000 |
$300,000 |
About 4.0 years using $450,000 annual payback cash |
| Upside |
$5.6M |
60% or $3.36M |
$1.65M |
$910,000 |
$800,000 |
About 2.3 years using $800,000 annual payback cash |
For an existing operation, valuation should focus on repeat-program gross profit, customer concentration, qualified process recipes, equipment condition, backlog quality, powder and gas contracts, quality history, and whether revenue depends on the seller's personal relationships. A buyer should normalize owner compensation, remove one-time development grants, add realistic maintenance capex, and test what happens if the largest customer pauses work for six months.
Investment logic
The attractive case is not simply “advanced technology commands a premium.” The attractive case is a qualified, repeatable repair that saves a customer far more than it costs, runs at stable deposition efficiency, uses a manageable gas recipe, fills otherwise idle cell capacity, and gets paid through milestone billing.
The Financial Model Connects Capacity to Cash and Payback
A useful financial model does more than total startup costs. It should connect every technical assumption to revenue, margin, funding, and owner cash. Founders often use a financial model, business plan, and pitch deck together so the operating logic, funding request, and commercial milestones tell the same story.
Assumption flow through the business
Every technical improvement must eventually show up as more accepted output, lower variable cost, faster cash collection, or less capital at risk.
1Startup investmentEquipment, integration, facility, qualification, working capital.
2CapacityAvailable cell hours × planned utilization × first-pass yield.
3RevenueEngineering fees + cell hours + powder + field work + testing.
4ContributionRevenue less powder, gas, machining, testing, freight, variable labor.
5Operating cashContribution less fixed labor, facility, insurance, sales, admin, maintenance.
6Owner cash and paybackOperating cash less debt, taxes, capex, and reserve growth.
The minimum model architecture
-
Startup schedule: deposits, shipping, installation, acceptance, training, and qualification cash by month.
-
Revenue engine: paid engineering programs, conversion rate, billable cell hours, realized rate, powder charges, field days, and repeat orders.
-
Unit economics: powder price, deposition efficiency, gas consumption, setup hours, direct labor, machining, testing, freight, and rework.
-
Capacity model: shifts, scheduled hours, maintenance, changeovers, utilization, first-pass acceptance, and bottlenecks outside the spray cell.
-
Cash conversion: customer deposits, milestone billing, inventory purchases, accounts payable, DSO, and retainage.
-
Financing: equity, equipment debt, working-capital line, interest, principal, covenants, and minimum cash.
-
Return analysis: EBITDA, free cash flow, owner salary, owner distributions, payback, and downside sensitivity.
One assumption can move six outputs
A ten-point drop in deposition efficiency raises powder cost, extends spray time, increases gas use, reduces capacity, delays delivery, and may increase working capital. The model should show all six effects rather than changing only the materials line.
Before committing capital, run at least three cases. The conservative case should assume slower customer qualification, lower utilization, weaker deposition efficiency, and longer receivable days. The base case should rely only on credible conversion and pricing evidence. The upside case should require named repeat programs or capacity expansion, not optimism. The final decision is straightforward: invest only when the downside case remains fundable, the base case covers debt and replacement capex, and the upside case does not depend on impossible cell hours.